A Linguistic Study: Satire in Malam Baretong Ceremony of Minangkabau Pariaman Wedding Tradition

  • Johannes Jefria Gultom Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Diah Mutiara Isnaeni Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Hawai Apriani Br Ginting Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Syamsul Bahri Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
Keywords: Satire, Malam Baretong, marriage customs, Minangkabau, Pariaman

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Satire in Malam Baretong event within the Minangkabau Pariaman wedding tradition holds profound philosophical meaning and serves as an effective tool for social control. It does not only serve as a critique but also as a tool to teach customary values, strengthen cultural identity, and maintain social balance. This applies to the Pariaman community, especially the younger generation whose understanding of Minangkabau cultural values is beginning to fade away. The purpose of this research is to understand and gain a better understanding of how satire is used in Malam Baretong event within the Minangkabau Pariaman wedding tradition. In this study, a descriptive qualitative approach is used to examine how various types of satire are clearly depicted in the Malam Baretong tradition of Minangkabau Pariaman weddings. In addition to direct observation and video recordings of  Malam Baretong traditional wedding ceremony, data were also collected from books and YouTube videos containing information about the language and cultural customs of the Minangkabau Pariaman regarding Malam Baretong traditional wedding ceremony, as well as interviews with three community leaders of Pariaman to confirm the data. The findings of this research are as follows: Irony=17 (39.5%), Cynicism=9 (20.9%), Sarcasm=4 (9.3%), Antiphrasis=6 (13.9%), Innuendo=7 (16.2%). The type of satire most frequently found is Irony=17 (39.5%), indicating that the use of ironic remarks during the Malam Baretong traditional wedding ceremony of the Minangkabau Pariaman is more subtle and polite, reflecting a sense of humor in familiarity and kinship. Sarcasm=4 (9.3%) is the least frequently found because it is rarely encountered in the speech of the Minangkabau Pariaman community, especially during traditional wedding ceremonies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adiyati, M. (2021). Kritik Sosial dalam Satire "Negeri Para Bedebah".

Bahri, S. (2020). Local wisdom on the use of Minangkabau proverbs meaning satire by the Minangkabau community in Medan. Southeast Asia Language Teaching and Learning (SALTeL) Journal. 3(1), 39–46. http://doi.org/10.35307/saltel.v3i1.46.

Hadisiswoyo, D. (2017). Dinamika adat baralek di Pariaman. Universitas Negeri Padang.

Hermansyah. (2023). Analisis pragmatik satire dalam dialek Pariaman pada acara Batagak Pangulu. Universitas Negeri Padang.

Kramsch, C. (2020). Language and culture. Oxford University Press.

Marlina, R. (2021). Analisis bentuk dan fungsi satire dalam tuturan adat Pariaman. Universitas Negeri Padang.

Mulyadi, Y. (2023). Pedoman ejaan Bahasa Indonesia yang disempurnakan dan problematika Bahasa Indonesia. Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa.

Oktavianus. (2023). Minangkabau Language as Ethnic Identity in Digital Era. Humanis. 27. 248. http://.doi.org/10.24843/JH.2023.v27.i03.p01.

Setia, Y. (2022). Penggunaan satire dalam pantun mudo-mudo Pariaman. Universitas Andalas.

Suryani, M. (2021). Pola linguistik satire dalam dialog pasambahan Pariaman. Universitas Andalas.

Syafrizal, A., & Team. (2020). Satire dan humor dalam Randai Pariaman: Kajian sosiolinguistik. Universitas Andalas.

Wahyuni, S. (2022). Fungsi edukatif satire dalam pepatah petitih Pariaman. Universitas Andalas.

W. S, H. (2019). Transformasi dan modernisasi adat Minangkabau. Gre Publishing.

Yusuf, R. (2023). Satire sebagai bentuk kritik sosial dalam Kaba Pariaman. Universitas Andalas.

Published
2025-07-29
How to Cite
Gultom, J. J., Isnaeni, D. M., Ginting, H. A. B., & Bahri, S. (2025). A Linguistic Study: Satire in Malam Baretong Ceremony of Minangkabau Pariaman Wedding Tradition . Randwick International of Social Science Journal, 6(3), 257-265. https://doi.org/10.47175/rissj.v6i3.1211