The Flag as a Symbol and Vision of Peace, Democracy, and Nation-Building

  • Joan Davison Rollins College, Winter Park, FL, USA
  • Jesenko Tešan Association of Societies in Transition, Zurich, Switzerland The European Graduate School
Keywords: flag design, design knowledge, human behaviour, conflict transformation

Abstract

The design of the flag of Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H) illustrates both the objectives and limitations of intentional design’s role in national healing and state building following violent conflict. The architecture and design of public buildings, spaces, and symbols can facilitate sociability or reinforce segregation and hostility. This analysis contends that design, especially of public symbols intended to evoke emotions and unity, can facilitate healing. Yet in this case, the flag's design ignores the conflict, assumes a utopia, thus failing to move society to reconciliation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bakhtin, M. (1982). The Dialogic Imagination, Austin, University of Texas Press.

Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

Bose, S. (2002). Bosnia after Dayton: Nationalist Partition and International Intervention. NewYork, Oxford University Press.

Davison, J., & Tesan, J. (2021). “Public spaces and conflict transformation: From Mostar’s Old Bridge to its United World College”, Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 8(3), 244-261. https://dx.doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/768

“Dayton at 25: After a quarter of a century of peace, Bosnia remains wretched.” (2020), The Economist, 21 Nov. https://www.economist.com/europe/2020/11/21/after-a-quarter-of-a-century-of-peace-bosnia-remains-wretched .

Easterling, K. (2014), Extrastatecraft:The Power of Infrastructure Space. New York, Verso Books. Kant, I. (2013/1998), Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804649

Le Corbusier. (1999). Talks with Students. NewYork, Princeton Architectural Press.

Le Corbusier. (2000). TheModulor:A Harmonious Measure to the Human Scale Universally Applicable to Architecture and Mechanics and Modulor 2. Basel, Birkhäuser.

Le Corbusier. (2001). Inside the Machine for Living. NewYork, Monacelli Press.

Le Corbusier. (2007 [1966/1987]). Journey to the East, In. Žaknić, I. (Ed., trans.), Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.

Lippman, P. (2019). Surviving the Peace:The Struggle for Postwar Recovery in Bosnia Herzegovina, Nashville, Vanderbilt University Press.

Norris, P. (2008). Driving Democracy: Do Power-Sharing Institutions Work? Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790614

Szakolczai, A. (2009). Reflexive Historical Sociology. London, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203193617

Tesan. J. (2018). Perpetual Peace Treaty as War: A Study in Permanent Liminality, National University of Ireland, Cork Department of Sociology.

Thomassen, B. (2008). “Mimetic errors in liminal schismogenesis: On the political anthropology of the trickster”, International Political Anthropology, 1(1), 3-24.

Woods, L. (1993). Pamphlet architecture 15: War and architecture (No. 15). New York, Princeton Architectural Press. https://lebbeuswoods.wordpress.com/2011/12/15/war-andarchitecture-three- principles/

Woods, L. (2001). Radical reconstruction. NewYork, Princeton Architectural Press.

Woods, L. (2011), War and Architecture: Three Principles, Word Press. https://lebbeuswoods.wordpress.com/2011/12/15/war-and-architecture-three-principles

Published
2024-04-30
How to Cite
Davison, J., & Tešan, J. (2024). The Flag as a Symbol and Vision of Peace, Democracy, and Nation-Building. Randwick International of Social Science Journal, 5(2), 291-302. https://doi.org/10.47175/rissj.v5i2.964