Exploring Transformative Leadership Approaches in Modern Educational Institutions

Jelyn S Sarong

doi:10.47175/rielsj.v4i4.845

Jelyn S Sarong Universitas Magsaysay College, Fabe Street, Poblacion, Magsaysay, Misamis Oriental, Philippines

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47175/rielsj.v4i4.845

Keywords: Transformative leadership, innovation, empathy, adaptability, staff development, professional growth, descriptive qualitative, Philippines

Abstract

This study examines transformative leadership within Philippine educational settings to discern its impact on student outcomes, staff development, and institutional effectiveness. A descriptive qualitative analysis involving diverse stakeholders revealed that transformative leadership diverges significantly from traditional management, emphasizing innovation, empathy, and adaptability. It fosters a culture where staff confidence and autonomy lead to professional growth and improved educational outcomes. In addition, the findings suggest that such leadership is essential for educational institutions navigating the complexities of modern education, including technological advancements and societal changes. Effective communication and systematic evaluation were identified as key for transformative leaders to measure and enhance student success, despite facing resistance to change. The study concludes that transformative leadership will become increasingly central in education, driving institutions towards inclusivity and a forward-thinking ethos. It was recommended that Philippine educational institutions adopt transformative leadership to bridge disparities, enhance quality, and prepare for future educational demands. The approach is particularly beneficial for public schools, higher education, TVET institutions, private educational providers, policymakers, and community learning centers, promising to elevate the quality of education in a rapidly evolving global landscape.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afsar, B., Badir, Y. F., Saeed, B. B., & Hafeez, S. (2017). Transformational and transactional leadership and employee’s entrepreneurial behavior in knowledge–intensive industries. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(2), 307-332.

Alahmad, Y. Y. (2016). Understanding the relationship between idealized influence, intellectual stimulation, inspirational motivation, individualized consideration and product innovation among manufacturing and services firms: the role of open system. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Toledo].

Al Harbi, J. A., Alarifi, S., & Mosbah, A. (2019). Transformation leadership and creativity: Effects of employees psychological empowerment and intrinsic motivation. Personnel Review, 48(5), 1082-1099.

Bojovic, I., & Jovanovic, S. S. (2020). Transformational leadership and psychological needs of employees. Technium Soc. Sci. J., 7, 226.

Burns, J. M. (2004). Transforming leadership: A new pursuit of happiness. Grove Press.Clodfelter, J., & Tapp, W. (2022). Vision for Tomorrow: Futures Thinking Among Independent School Leaders (Doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University. Peabody College).

Gul, T., Demir, K., & Criswell, B. (2019). Constructing teacher leadership through mentoring: Functionality of mentoring practices in evolving teacher leadership. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(3), 209-228.

Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2012). The global fourth way: The quest for educational excellence. Corwin Press.

Kho, J., Gillespie, N., & Martin-Khan, M. (2020). A systematic scoping review of change management practices used for telemedicine service implementations. BMC health services research, 20, 1-16.

Kilag, O. K., Tokong, C., Enriquez, B., Deiparine, J., Purisima, R., & Zamora, M. (2023). School Leaders: The Extent of Management Empowerment and Its Impact on Teacher and School Effectiveness. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(1), 127-140.

Koveshnikov, A., & Ehrnrooth, M. (2018). The cross-cultural variation of the effects of transformational leadership behaviors on followers’ organizational identification: The case of idealized influence and individualized consideration in Finland and Russia. Management and Organization Review, 14(4), 747-779.

Njah, J., Hansoti, B., Adeyami, A., Bruce, K., O’malley, G., Gugerty, M. K., ... & Kimball, A. M. (2021). Measuring for success: Evaluating leadership training programs for sustainable impact. Annals of global health, 87(1).

Pawar, A. (2016). Transformational leadership: inspirational, intellectual and motivational stimulation in business. International Journal of Enhanced Research in Management & Computer Applications, 5(5), 14-21.

Reimers, F. M. (2020). Educating students to improve the world (p. 131). Springer Nature. Saad Alessa, G. (2021). The dimensions of transformational leadership and its organizational effects in public universities in Saudi Arabia: A systematic review. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 682092.

Sorenson, G. (2015). James Macgregor Burns: 3 August 1918, 15 July 2014. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 159(4), 475.

Zhu, W., Sosik, J. J., Riggio, R. E., & Yang, B. (2012). Relationships between transformational and active transactional leadership and followers’ organizational identification: The role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 13(3), 168-212.Irony. International Kierkegaard Commentary.