Sexisms on Facebook Page Threads of Xyriel Manabat:  A Linguistic Analysis

Kathleen Joy Asarcon; Kaye  Buhia; Marites An  Quimbo; Jelyn  Pepito; Joemar  Minoza

doi:10.47175/rielsj.v5i3.1055

Kathleen Joy Asarcon College of Arts and Sciences, Cebu Technological University, Tuburan, Cebu, Philippines
Kaye Buhia College of Arts and Sciences, Cebu Technological University, Tuburan, Cebu, Philippines
Marites An Quimbo College of Arts and Sciences, Cebu Technological University, Tuburan, Cebu, Philippines
Jelyn Pepito College of Arts and Sciences, Cebu Technological University, Tuburan, Cebu, Philippines
Joemar Minoza College of Teacher Education, Cebu Technological University, Consolacion, Cebu, Philippines

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47175/rielsj.v5i3.1055

Keywords: sexism, facebook, linguistic analysis

Abstract

Linguistic sensitivity is crucial in shaping individuals' thoughts, perceptions, and attitudes. The impact of language influences the creation of opportunities or the imposition of boundaries. This study delves into the realm of sexist language on the Facebook Page threads of the Filipina Child Star Xyriel Manabat, exploring both linguistic and non-linguistic aspects. Drawing on Mill's sexist language typology and Herring et al.'s framework for non-linguistic features, five posts from 2021-2022, gathering the 50 most engaging comments were analyzed. Of these, 36 comments exhibited sexist language. The findings identified five overt forms of sexism, including Naming, Insult terms, Semantic Derogation, and generic Pronouns, while indirect sexism manifested in Humor and Presupposition. Non-linguistic features, such as Emoji and Emoticons, Stickers and GIFs, Images, and Videos, were also noted in sexist comments. The conclusion drawn is that Xyriel Manabat's Facebook page comment sections contain sexist languages, characterized by specific linguistic and non-linguistic features. The study advocates for the use of gender-fair language in social media and educational settings, emphasizing the need for linguistic sexism awareness. Additionally, it encourages future research to explore other platforms and materials for comparative analysis, aiming to contribute to a broader understanding of linguistic dynamics in contemporary communication.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arab, R., & Milner Davis, J. (2022). Humour and belonging. The European Journal of Humour Research, 10(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.7592/ejhr.2022.10.2.643

Capuyan, A., Capuyan, M. P., Jayme, P. D., Minoza, J., & Flores, R. (2023). Facebook Commentaries in Leni Robredo’s Presidential Campaign: Sexism Illumination. OKARA: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 17(2), 281-299. https://doi.org/10.19105/ojbs.v17i2.10271

Cormack, M. (2021). Being sexually harassed made me hat having big boobs. Cosmopolitan. Retrieved from https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/body/a35873430/sexual-harassment-bodyconfidenceboobs/?fbclid=IwAR0loImuHNFMtgjmViLGCkoECgWEO7z7H44s0W4OdndPV6oIXx1gpAlAbc

Dresner, E., & Herring, S. C. (2010). Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication Theory, 20(3), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01362.x

Emoji Meaning | Dictionary.com. (2018). September 11, 2024. https://www.dictionary.com/e/emoji/100-emoji

Erle, T. M., Schmid, K., Goslar, S. H., & Martin, J. D. (2022). Emojis as social information in digital communication. Emotion, 22(7), 1529-1543. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000992

Fajardo, E., & Buenaventura, B. (2023). Language and Gender: A Case Study of The Communique and The Mentors Student Publications. 7, 11–23. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372316342_Language_and_Gender_A_Case_Study_of_The_Communique_and_The_Mentors_Student_Publications

Felmlee, D., Inara Rodis, P., & Zhang, A. (2019). Sexist Slurs: Reinforcing Feminine Stereotypes Online. Sex Roles, 83(1), 16-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01095-z

Fontecha, A., & Catalan, R. (2003). Semantic derogation in animal metaphor: A contrastive-cognitive analysis of two male/female examples in English and Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(5), 771-797. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(02)00127-3

Ford, T. E., & Ferguson, M. A. (2004). Social consequences of disparagement humor: a prejudiced norm theory. Personality and social psychology review: an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 8(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0801_4

Ford, T. E., Boxer, C. F., Armstrong, J., & Edel, J. R. (2008). More than "just a joke": The prejudice-releasing function of sexist humor. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207310022

French, J. H. (2017). Image-based memes as sentiment predictors. International Conference on Information Society (i-Society), 80-85. https://doi.org/10.23919/i-society.2017.8354676

Garcia, M. (2021). We Are Not Born Submissive: How Patriarchy Shapes Women's Lives. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.

Gustilo, L. E., & Dino, C. M. (2017). Digitalk: An Analysis of Linguistic Features and Their Functions in Filipino Computer-Mediated Communication. Advanced Science Letters, 23(2), 1055-1059. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.7494

Herring, S., & Dainas, A. (2017). “Nice Picture Comment!” Graphicons in Facebook Comment Threads. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2017.264

Ivy, D. K., & Backlund, P. (2000). Exploring Genderspeak. New York: McGraw-Hill Humanities, Social Sciences & World Languages.

Laksminy, L. P., & Rajeg, G. P. W. (2023). Sexist Language in Indonesian via Metaphor and Transitivity. Lingual: Journal of Language and Culture, 15(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.24843/ljlc.2023.v15.i01.p02

Mahmud, Y., & Idegbekwe, D. (2020). A Multimodal Discursive Analysis of the Communicative Elements of Sexism in Facebook Picture Uploads. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 2(2), 62-75. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v2i2.262

Merelli, A. (2015). Gentlemen, here is how not to mansplain feminism to women. Quartz. Retrieved from https://qz.com/482219/gentlemen-here-is-how-not-to-mansplain-feminism-to-women/

Mills, S. (2008). Language and Sexism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mwakapina, J. W. (2021). What is the Nature of Language? How does it Behave? What is Language Learning then? A Review Paper in Applied Linguistics. Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science Journal, 2(4), 603-618. https://doi.org/10.47175/rielsj.v2i4.357

Rivera, F., & Adriatico, D. (2022). Sexist Languages on the Facebook Page Threads of Philippines. E-Dawa: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 1(1), 110-127. https://doi.org/10.56901/vluc5863

Sales, A. J. G., Leuterio, G. D., Lopez, L. J. S., Matinao, C. D. G., Naces, L. C., & Ramos, A. L. (2022). Advertisements and Sexism in the Philippines. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 3(9), 1664–1672.

Use images and media to enhance understanding | Digital. Digital Accessiblity. September 11, 2024. https://accessibility.huit.harvard.edu/use-images-and-media-enhance-understanding

Villenes, Z. (2021). What is sexism? Types, examples, and their impact. Medical News Today. September 11, 2024. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/what-is-sexism

Wulandari, S. W., Purwaningsih, E., & Hawasi, H. (2017). Sexist Language Used In “The Jakarta Post”. Journal of Language and Literature, 4(1), 86-100.

Yagoda, M. (2015) Emoji Study Shows How Americans Flirt. People. September 11, 2024. https://people.com/celebrity/emoji-study-shows-how-americans-flirt/100