Analyzing Finite Dependent Clauses in English Writing: A Study of Mahlabatheng High School Grade 11 Students
Abstract
Though the concept of subordination has been explored in the context of L1 and L2 speakers of English language, more attention has been on the leaners of higher education. Against this background, the present paper set out to explore the use of finite dependent clauses by Mahlabatheng High School Grade 11 students where the main objective is to examine the extent to which the learners portray their ability to use finite dependent clauses and to also investigate whether they are able to use different types of such clauses. In order to achieve this objective, the study applied both qualitative and quantitative research methods, which included analysis of data obtained from students’ sample essays. The study used a combination of convenience and purposive sampling to select a sample of twenty-five students from whom the data was collected. The findings of the study revealed that students are able to demonstrate their ability to use the finite dependent clauses as on average, 96 percent of the total population were able to use finite dependent clauses in their writing and they used different types. The results further demonstrated that most students did not use the nominal clauses as compared to the other types of finite dependent clauses. The study, therefore, concludes that Mahlabatheng High School Grade 11 learners have ability to use finite dependent clauses. However, the recommendation is that more focus should be put on the nominal clauses.
Downloads
References
Alroudhan, H. (2016). The Acquisition of English Restrictive Relative Clause by Arab Adult EFT Learners. Journal of Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(1), 33-37.
Baroroh, A. & Hani, U. (2020). Students’ Mastery of Adjective Clause: A case Study Towards the Second Semester Students of English Department. Journal of Language and Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 62-81.
Berk, I. M. (1999). English Syntax from Word to Discourse. Oxford University.
Biber, D., Johansson,S., Leech,G., Conrad, S & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Pearson Education Ltd.
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. Mouton.
Hunt, K. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. (Research Report No.3). Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Kies. (1999). Clauses. Http://Papyr.Com/Hypertextbooks/Grammar/Cmplx3.Htm.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Leech, G. & J. Svartvik. (2002). A Communicative of English Grammar (3rd ed). Pearson Education Limited.
Lin, J. (2015). Adverbial Clauses. www.researchgate.net.
Maleke, M. (2011). Usage and Metalinguistic Knowledge of Subordinate Clauses among NUL Students. (MA dissertation). National University of Lesotho.
Morato-Maleke, M. E. (2019). The Relationship between Syntactic Complexity and Grammatical Accuracy in English as a Second Language: A Case Study of NUL Students’ Writing. (Doctoral dissertation). National University of Lesotho.
Morato-Maleke & Mokhathi-Mbhele, M. L. (2020). The Use of Relative Clauses as a Syntactic Complexity Measure by NUL Students. National University of Lesotho.
Rafajlovicova, R. (2014). Subordinate Clauses: Their Forms and Functions in Different Text Types. Institute of British and American Studies.
Sada, M. (2021). Nominal Clauses. www.researchgate.net
Copyright (c) 2025 Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.